Do Parties Matter? Explaining Legislative Productivity in the American States
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Legislative Productivity and Divided Government in the US and France
Comparing rates of legislative productivity in periods of unified and divided control of the executive and legislative branches in the US and France, we show first that the concept of ―divided government‖ is more complicated than scholars have allowed. In the US, truly unified government, where the president enjoys a filibuster-proof majority in the Senate as well as a majority in the House, is...
متن کاملCompeting Gridlock Models, Party Influence, and Legislative Productivity
Formal models of lawmaking imply that legislative productivity is a function of the distribution of legislators’ preferences, but disagreement about the role of parties leads to competing models that differ in terms of which legislators’ preference matter. We solve a difficult problem in discriminating between competing theories that arises from the unobservability of status quo policies by con...
متن کاملDeficits and surpluses in federated states: A review of the Public Choice empirical literature
The purpose of this paper is to review the empirical Public Choice literature explaining deficits levels in federated states. First, I descritbe theoretical constructs, showing how new theories are developed by releasing one of the basic Ricardo-Barro assumptions. Empirical results bearing on the federated states of Australia, Canada, Germany, Switzerland, and the United States are then reviewe...
متن کاملPolitical Parties and the Representativeness Of Legislative Committees
What role do parties play in determining which interests committees represent? In this article, I compare committee organization and representativeness in Nebraska’s nonpartisan legislature with those in the partisan senates of Kansas and Iowa. I demonstrate that when parties do not organize legislative conflict, committees are less representative of the full chamber. I argue, however, that com...
متن کاملدیپلماسی نومحافظه کاران کنگره آمریکا در قبال جمهوری اسلامی ایران (2016 ـ 2009)
The study of US Congressional foreign policy over the eight years of Barack Obama's presidency shows that the focus of the neoconservative research centers has been influencing on Congress since 2009. Since the time of the 11th United States Congress, the American legislature's approach towards the Islamic Republic of Iran has been steadily moving towards a preemptive legislative diplomacy and ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2009